This article is available as a
gzipped PostScript
file.
In a
previous paper we have presented a review of various approaches in
the literature towards the derivation of so-called thermodynamic
uncertainty relations in statistical thermodynamics. This review
has been critical. We have argued that some of these approaches
are sound, i.e. they reach a valid conclusion, albeit under
restricted conditions, whereas others were found to be incoherent
and could not withstand the scrutiny of logical analysis. In the
latter category we have included work of Lavenda on this topic.
However, in a comment (
Found. Phys. Lett. 13, 487
(2000)), Lavenda claims to have uncovered ``fundamental errors'' in our paper. In this reply we show that these claims are mistaken.
Keywords: thermodynamics, uncertainty relations, second law.